Chicago Tribune (Jo Napolitano) published an article about Chris Welch, the president of the Proviso Township High Schools board of ed,
having the school district pay his legal bills.
What's new in the Trib story?
Welch--I believe for the first time--publicly acknowledged he is one of the writers for Proviso Insider. He denies writing
the allegations that are the basis for Mark Sterk's defamation suit.
Board member Theresa Kelly filed a complaint with the
regional superintendent of schools, Charles Flowers. Flowers was formerly a board member with Kelly and Welch. Flowers is a politically enemy of Welch.
There's some discussion of the possibility Welch was acting in the scope of his duties as a member of the board of education.
I don't like the way the article handled this. One, it omits that Welch denied being involved in Proviso Insider. It seems impossible to reconcile the claim Welch's writings on Proviso Insider were part of his duties as a member of the board of education and the fact that he was doing the writing anonymously.
Two, Welch is never required to give a cogent explanation how his writings were in the scope of his duties.
If a claim isn't reasonable, I have a problem will journalists printing it. People who are doing things that are illegal shouldn't be able to offer untrue justifications without a clear explanation the claim is untrue.
Welch called his service as board president "a 24-hour-a-day job." He said that he has been sued three times before and that his legal fees were covered by the district on each occasion.
This is a logical fallacy. Welch has been sued for his actions as a board member. But that doesn't mean that everything he could get sued for is somehow related to his position as a board member.
In fact, Welch has filed a suit of his own against the firm, alleging the attorneys put pressure on his former employer to try to convince Welch that the board shouldn't dismiss Odelson & Sterk.
This is an interesting wrinkle in the story. For more info, see
Proviso Insider.
Board members Bob Cox and Dan Adams are quoted defending their votes to pay the legal bills in question.
There's also a discussion on
Forest Park Forums.
[
UPDATE, June 25, 2008: Forest Park Review (Josh Adams) has more details and there's a tough
Forest Park Review editorial.]
Labels: Chicago Tribune, Emanuel Chris Welch, Forest Park Forums, Mark Sterk, Proviso Insider