MEDIA, Forest Park Review editorial page
What do you think of the Forest Park Review editorial page?
One person complained the editorial on the conclusion of the hearings to fire Sgt. Dan Harder is difficult to decipher. I think the editorial is making the case the charges against Harder are bullshit and the people involved have behaved poorly. But the problem has become that Harder is not likely to be welcome back in the Forest Park PD at this point.
I think the point of the editorial is that the Village of Forest Park is in a "no win" situation, but the Forest Park Review doesn't want to assign blame for who created the "no win" situation.
Also, there's now an editorial cartoonist. I'm a little disappointed that there wasn't a caricature of any of the commissioners or other village officials.
One person complained the editorial on the conclusion of the hearings to fire Sgt. Dan Harder is difficult to decipher. I think the editorial is making the case the charges against Harder are bullshit and the people involved have behaved poorly. But the problem has become that Harder is not likely to be welcome back in the Forest Park PD at this point.
I think the point of the editorial is that the Village of Forest Park is in a "no win" situation, but the Forest Park Review doesn't want to assign blame for who created the "no win" situation.
Also, there's now an editorial cartoonist. I'm a little disappointed that there wasn't a caricature of any of the commissioners or other village officials.
1 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By Anonymous, at 9:35 PM, December 13, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home