GOV, why violate Open Meetings Act when firing?
When District 88 fired Dr. Willie Mack it didn't post the issue in advance as required by the Open Meetings Act.
Dr. Kelvin Gilchrist was also fired on no notice. Like Mack, the authorities sought to lock Gilchrist out of his office immediately.
James K. Graham, Sr. was also fired on short notice.
And Greg Jackson too.
If the Moore/Welch/Thurman gang have the votes, why not simply announce these firings in advance? District 88 has already been warned on Open Meetings Act violations. Are Moore and Welch so confident that State's Attorney Dick Devine will give 'em a pass?
But why bend or break the rules if they don't need to?
Are they pathologically dishonest?
Or maybe there is some method in their tactics...?
Here's a hypothesis: the Moore/Welch/Thurman gang are eager to get people locked out of the building as quickly as possible to keep certain records from being photocopied. These records would show an appearance of impropriety or illegal conduct on the part of members of the board majority.
Dr. Kelvin Gilchrist was also fired on no notice. Like Mack, the authorities sought to lock Gilchrist out of his office immediately.
James K. Graham, Sr. was also fired on short notice.
And Greg Jackson too.
If the Moore/Welch/Thurman gang have the votes, why not simply announce these firings in advance? District 88 has already been warned on Open Meetings Act violations. Are Moore and Welch so confident that State's Attorney Dick Devine will give 'em a pass?
But why bend or break the rules if they don't need to?
Are they pathologically dishonest?
Or maybe there is some method in their tactics...?
Here's a hypothesis: the Moore/Welch/Thurman gang are eager to get people locked out of the building as quickly as possible to keep certain records from being photocopied. These records would show an appearance of impropriety or illegal conduct on the part of members of the board majority.
posted by Carl Nyberg at
3:05 PM
6 Comments:
You see what is really going on is a fight between two Masonic Lidges in Maywood! Moore thinks his lodge should dominate bussiness in Proviso,since his lodge controls Maywood,Bellwood,and Forest Park. Welch is begining to see the light, but truely is blind!
Yarbrough comes from the East, and the Main Lodge,48 and Cottage Grove wants Yarbrough! A special request by the head of the Scotish Knights,who lives in Melrose Park and is the highest commander in the Chicago area is making the rounds throughout the lodges to denouce the tratourous actions of Welch and Moore!
Both of those heretics,Welch and Moore, will be expelled from there brothers forever, and they(Welch and Moore) are being watched because the have broken the code!
By
Anonymous, at 8:27 PM, January 19, 2006
Light of the east ...what the hell are you talking about?
Carl, crack pots need to be banished from the blog.
By
Anonymous, at 11:46 PM, January 19, 2006
"THE TRUTH IS MY DEFENCE"
The truth shall be the light until the end of time. The main question is how many of our Brothers will admit to the truth as well as carry out the true meaning of values and ethics involved in the core of the truth.Who made MOORE? Is he true? Who made Welch? Is he true? Please answer in the truth of our Fathers who walked before us in hopes that e would be true. Where is the light of our two Brothers who have sold out the bright torch for a dim flickker of shame!
Who is True?
1. Who forced Welch to run against Yarbrough?
2. Who covered up the beating of the white woman in Hillside Illinois?
3. Who really financed the Welch School Board campaign and now his Stat Rep. Race?
4. Who really was at the Moore Resident when the student drowned in his pool?
5. Who really forced Moore to churn MOORE $$$$$$$ in pencion fund money from Maywood PD?
6. Who really forced Welch to terminate Jackson,Gilchrist,Head,Wicks,Trumbetta,Manzo and others?
7. Who assisted Welch in the conspiracy at SD88 to get rid of DR. Montoya, DR. Mack, James Grahamm,Ray Zabal
8. Who forced Welch to cover up illegal board activity at SD209 and SD88
9. Who really forced the SD209 Janitors to pass out countless political litature for Welch?
10. Who really forced the police officers who work at SD209 to assist in the Welch / Moore campaign ? if they dont help will they loose thier jobs at 209?
11. How much money was the employee at 209 and SD89 obligated to raise for Welch / Moore Campaign?
BE TRUE!! YOU DONT HAVE TO BE FORCED TO SUPPORT PEOPLE WHO ARE QUSI SLAVE MASTERS! STOP THE ILLS. BE TRUE CHRIS, BE TRUE MY BROTHER.PLEASE LET THE TRUTH BE YOUR DEFENCE.TELL US WHO RAISED YOU TO BECOME THE SNAKE THAT YOU ARE?
GOD BLESS YOU FOR YOUR DEMISE IS NEAR.
By
Anonymous, at 12:07 AM, January 20, 2006
Sippim on Jack....
Speak on........
By
Anonymous, at 9:04 AM, January 20, 2006
yup true that my man!!!!
By
Anonymous, at 1:39 PM, January 27, 2006
C.C says
FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT
Citizen's Remedy Against Torts Perpetrated by Government Personnel
Title 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) provides, in pertinent part:
"An action shall not be instituted upon a claim against the United States for money damages for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. The failure of an agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section."
Title 28 USC § 2401(b)
A tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented.
Title 28 USC § 2675:
The failure of an agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section.
Title 28 U.S.C. 2401(b) requires the claimant both to file the claim with the agency within two years after accrual of the claim and then to file a complaint in the District Court within six months after the agency denies the claim.
Title 28 USC § 2401(b)
A tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) provides, in pertinent part:
An action shall not be instituted upon a claim against the United States for money damages for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. The failure of an agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Claims Against United States
By
Anonymous, at 7:21 PM, January 27, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home